Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave S's avatar

I hope whichever one of your friends challenged you to use the word tropospheric in today’s column owes you a beer now.

Expand full comment
Pete Olski's avatar

CB and Edge are Packer needs; I read the reviews carefully despite the Packers picking at 23, likely long after these gentlemen are gone.

I can sympathize with Mykel Williams. My high school football team went 2-34 during my four years, losing 29 straight, nearly always shut out. I was blessed with a high ankle sprain early my senior year and sat out half the season. I healed faster than Williams as I never stressed the ankle leaping off the bench in celebration. Properly factoring injuries into scouting evaluations didn't change the book on me: "The kid can't play."

The arm length scrutiny kills me. A left tackle with 34-1/4" arms is a first round hopeful; a left tackle with 33-7/8" arms is a third round guard. In pass pro, how one positions the hips and shoulders is far more important than a half inch of arm length. At DB, arm length is meaningless three feet away from the receiver. Even in tight coverage, the biggest DB deficit isn't arm length but that half the DBs can't locate the ball to make a play on it. Arm length, RAS, three cone drills, 40-yard splits, it's all a means for coaches, scouts, podcasters, insiders, team video splicers, and writers to make a living, which is all well and good. I'm all for it and enjoy it. Toss the numbers, tune out the static: the kid can play or the kid can't play, arm length be damned.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts